ZAMBIA - National Breweries says Government’s decision to introduce new tax on opaque beer in the 2017 national budget is likely to discourage tax evasion and help promote compliance.
EGYPT - Egypt made an official trade agency responsible for inspecting imported wheat, a step that could end disruptions in the purchases of world’s biggest wheat buyer by replacing quarantine officials who rejected several shipments this year for containing the ergot fungus.
GHANA - The Ghana Standards Authority (GSA) is working with stakeholders to establish a National Standardisation Strategy Taskforce that would help design and implement a national standardisation plan relevant for businesses and services by January next year.
Nairobi Bottlers is Kenya’s largest bottler of Coca-Cola range of products. The company has recently invested aggressively in its processes, packaging and people, thereby improving its efficiency, competiveness and sustainability focus.
This feature appeared in the May 2016 issue of Food Business Africa magazine
FoodWorld Media had a discussion with Duncan Kimani, the company’s Country Manufacturing Manager – Kenya and his team.
Alpha Grain Millers is one of the fastest growing flour milling businesses in Kenya. Started just four years ago, the company recently inaugurated a new wheat milling plant that has nearly doubled its production capacity.
This feature appeared in the January 2015 issue of Food Business Africa magazine
FoodWorld Media sat down with Mr. Osman Maalim Mohammed, the General Manager, and Mr. Mohamednur Khalif, the Managing Director to discuss more about the company.
INDUSTRY FOCUS: DAIRY INDUSTRY IN UGANDA
This article appeared in the July 2014 issue of Food Business Africa magazine. You can access the original article here: http://issuu.com/foodworldmedia/docs/food_business_june_july_2014
The dairy processing industry in Uganda is one of the most promising on the continent. Nearly non-existent a few years ago due to political turmoil, the sector has over the year’s taken advantage of good weather and rising population to post one of the fastest growth rates in Africa.
The story of the dairy processing industry in Uganda is a recent one, but with a long history behind it. Having achieved its independence from the British in 1962, Uganda went through a long period of coups and counter-coups from the 1960s all the way to the mid-1980s, when the present regime swept to power in 1986 and started the job of rebuilding an economy that had been battered by decades of war.
These decades of war ravaged Uganda’s agriculture and economy, and the dairy industry was not spared.
Dairy Corporation, once the country’s leading dairy collapsed in the middle of the war having been formed in 1967 with the aim of dairy development, dairy products marketing and dairy regulation in the country.
Further, the country’s national cattle herd declined from 8 million in 1970 to 3.5 million by 1985, dealing a severe blow to the country’s dream of being a leader in milk and beef production and processing.
With good tropical weather and adequate rainfall nearly throughout the year, Uganda is a dairy paradise. The process of rebuilding of the herd and the general dairy industry has taken nearly 30 years but the process has brought the dairy sector in this East African country immense benefits.
It is important to note that less than 10 years ago, Uganda was a huge importer of dairy products from UHT milk and fermented products, mainly from Kenya, despite the abundance of milk in the country due to limited infrastructure to collect and process the milk in the country.
This has since changed, with the country becoming a net exporter not only of processed UHT milk but also of milk powder, ghee, butter and cream to Kenya and the region.
“Total national milk production has grown from 365 million litres in 1991 to over 1.4 billion by the end of 2006 with per capital milk consumption growing from 16 litres in 1985 to 50 litres by end of 2007”, according to Dairy Investment Opportunities in Uganda, a report by SNV released in 2008.
National milk production stood at 1.8 billion in July 2012, according to the Dairy Development Authority (DDA). Currently milk volumes stand at about 2.0-2.5 billion litres annually, according to our estimates.
The dairy industry in Uganda contributes about 9% of the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The sector is a significant contributor to the nutritional, economic and employment opportunities of the rural communities, with dairy farming being a major activity in the south western, central and north eastern part of the country.
Central (around Kampala) and south western (near the Rwanda border) milk sheds together contribute 50% of the total national production, and can be classified as milk secure. The rest of the country face a milk deficit at various times during the year, especially during the dry season, with yields plummeting accordingly during these lean times
The sector is dominated by traditional breeds of cattle, long used to the weather and husbandry practices as practiced by the herder communities, conditions that many exotic breeds would not manage to withstand.
Exotic breeds have been introduced but their adoption is still limited to a few farms, with the majority having mixed breeds, thereby affecting the productivity of a majority of the farms.
Challenges in the dairy value chain
The dairy industry in Uganda faces a number of constraints that have affected and will continue to negatively affect the ability of the sector to reach its full potential. The sector is further beset by legacy issues: the dairy keepers are not keepers of animals for business, but are culturally bound to their animals as part of their culture and lifestyle.
As long as the majority of the farmers continue to be ‘recreational’ farmers, the industry, despite the gains it has made in the last 30 years will struggle to find its place in world trade.
These constraints however continue to be tackled as the country gears up to play a major role in the regional milk market.
Infrastructural inadequacies – Uganda suffers from lack of adequate infrastructure capacity both at the farm and in processing. Most of the high producing areas lack good quality roads, electricity, cooling facilities and piped water that are critical in preserving milk quality at the farm.
Post-milking loss at the farm is therefore high especially in high production areas during the flush period, leading to loss of farmer’s income. Lack of cooling facilities and electricity to keep the milk in cold conditions after milking negatively affects milk quality and farmer’s capacity to use milk as a source of income
At the processing level, although installed capacity by dairy processors has been boosted by a number of key investments, dairy processors have to contend with lack of good adequate cooling facilities on the farms, with a majority having to construct their own cooling centers. Dairies are still grappling with high costs rising from inadequate and expensive electricity and costs of distribution of the processed milk
Seasonability of milk supply – The supply of milk can swing from a surplus to a drastic deficit in the space of one month, disrupting production plans and processor margin expectations, with milk prices more than doubling from the normal USh 450 per litre to USh 1200 per litre in the same period.
The country experiences its low period during the months of June to August and also around December to February, with the rest of the year having adequate supplies.
Milk quantities can fall by as much as 70% during the height of the lean period, seriously affecting factory operations
Poor milk quality – Poor husbandry and inadequate cooling facilities on the farm have contributed to milk of marginal quality getting to the dairies. Considering that dairies could be located 300 km away from the milk collection area, significant losses are experienced by processors and farmers alike when milk cannot be accepted by the dairy or the processor has to absorb losses that occur due to lack of storage once the milk has been received.
To add to this is the proliferation of milk sellers and vendors in the villages and towns, who provide cash payments to farmers but whose skills and honesty cannot be guaranteed, risking consumer health and safety.
Low productivity at the farm level – Despite the abundance of water and green all round, the reliance of the dairy community on the weather is a huge impediment to the growth of the industry in Uganda. Farmers, long used to feeding their animals on pasture, have found it difficult to adopt intensive farming which can lead to higher production. The use of animal feed to supplement pasture is rare and will take time to be practiced by a majority of farmers.
This is worrying, as the country has recently installed capacity that requires more milk to be sourced from the farms all year round, so that the country can take advantage of the rising local and regional opportunities. This can stall the country’s progress, with some of the processors exiting or losing money from their investments.
The industry in Uganda is regulated by the Dairy Development Authority, a body tasked with the development of the dairy sector as well. Under an Executive Director DDA started its operations in 2000 having been created in 1998, following the enactment of the Dairy Industry Act.
The Dairy Industry Act replaced the previous Dairy Master Plan of 1993. The Dairy Industry Act created the DDA and actualized the privatization of the Dairy Corporation, which was leased to the Sameer Agriculture & Livestock Ltd in 2006.
According to the East African Agribusiness magazine liberalisation encouraged private sector investment in milk collection, transportation processing, milk distribution and marketing – with the result that from 1993 to 2006, fifteen medium to large scale processing plants were setup which increased the total national installed capacity to about 400,000 litres per day, even though, most of them were operating at 45% capacity utilisation.
Sameer Agriculture & Livestock
SALL is Uganda’s leading and the most diversified dairy company, producing extended shelf life and UHT liquid milk, yoghurt, butter, cream, milk powder while also distributing ice cream products from its Kenyan sister company. The dairy leased the former Dairy Corporation of Uganda plant in Kampala, following the liberalization of the sector in 1996 and has invested further in the milk powder and juice plants plus other facilities including cooling centers around the country.
Jesa Dairy Farm
Located on a farm in Busunju near Kampala, Jesa Dairy Farm belongs is part of the Mulwana Group. The dairy has been in existence since the 1980s. The dairy produces fresh milk, ESL milk and flavoured and fruit yoghurt.
The dairy commenced operations in 2013, producing milk powder and butter milk mainly for export. The company has indicated on its website that they will produce other milk products in future.
The new kid on the block, Amos Dairy has an installed capacity of 400,000 litres per day according to press reports, with a goal of processing 2 million litres in a few years. The company is currently producing casein, and is planning to produce whey, anhydrous fat and ghee in future.
The company, located in Mbabara is the only major processor of cheese in Uganda.
The future prospects for the dairy industry is bright, driven by an increasing youthful population, positive outlook on production increase (driven by increased productivity and introduction of dairy farming in non-traditional dairy areas e.g. the North), and increasing incomes and increasing urbanization.
The sector is ripe for acquisitions though. Although Sameer Agriculture & Livestock has been a significant player, turning a once state-owned factory around, there are reports that the business has struggled somewhat in the market. Other players are fairly small to make a big move in the sector, and are better off being bought by bigger players that have the muscle to make aggressive in roads in the sector.
We foresee this sector either consolidating or having a new batch of foreign owners in the next few years.
Table: A matrix of what major dairy companies produce
|Sameer Livestock & Agriculture||Fresh Dairy, Daima||
Fresh milk, UHT milk, ESL milk, butter, ghee, yoghurt, milk powder, juice.
Ice cream (distributed from Kenya affiliate)
|Jesa Farm||Jesa||Fresh milk, ESL milk, yoghurt|
|GBK Dairy||Classic||UHT milk, yoghurt|
|Hillside||Hillside||UHT milk, yoghurt|
|Rainbow Industries||Rainbow||UHT milk, ice cream, yoghurt|
|Pearl dairy||Lato||Milk powder, butter oil|
|Kookee Enterprises||Kooksy||Ice cream, yoghurt|
SPECIAL REPORT: Can Africa sort out the Aflatoxin problem?
Africa faces many challenges on the food front. The continent is grappling with efforts to feed its increasing population, projected to reach 2 billion by 2050, by the African Union. The presence of aflatoxin in foods has adversely affected not only the grain milling sector of the economy but also the health of the population and the ability of the Continent to trade with the rest of the World.
Perhaps no issue straddles the cereals sector in Africa like the issue of aflatoxin. The problem of aflatoxin in many African diets has had a huge but, many a time, silent effect on the population of Africa.
The presence of aflatoxin in maize, peanuts and other cereals is extremely critical in a continent where there are many challenges; including low productivity of cereals due to poor agronomic practices, high levels of post-harvest losses, low levels of sophistication in processing and handling of grains, frequent shortages that often lead to famines, and high consumer prices of grain
The issue of aflatoxins in cereals is a huge impediment to the nutritional and economic well-being of Africa’s population. For the cereal handling and milling sector of the food industry, the economic and nutrition effects of aflatoxin in grains are huge.
This is an issue that worries Stephen Muchiri, the CEO of the Eastern African Farmers Federation (EAFF), Nairobi, Kenya, to no small extent.
Mr Muchiri, who heads this regional farmers association, contends that “national governments don’t seem to be doing enough to create awareness on this issue to farmers, traders, processors and consumers; establish and invest in data collection and enforce the regulations especially on standards of various products”.
He also adds that farmers are “not at all equipped with the know-how or alternatives or tools for control of aflatoxin”.
Aflatoxins tend to affect Africa quite drastically as the entire continent falls within the 40 N and 40 S of the equator, where aflatoxin prevalence is most common.
In Africa, the problem is caused by various factors such as drought, poor agricultural practices, as well as improper storage and postharvest handling systems. It is further exacerbated due to heavy dietary reliance on staple foods such as maize and groundnuts which are highly susceptible to aflatoxin, according to Amare Ayalew, PhD., the Program Manager for Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA), an Africa wide forum based at the African Union, based in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
What are aflatoxins?
Aflatoxins are toxic metabolites produced by certain fungi in/on foods and feeds. They are mainly caused by some strains of Aspergillus flavus, but also most if not all strains of A. parasiticus, A. niger and A. nomius.
The occurrence of aflatoxins iscommon inpeanuts, tree nuts, maize, and animal feeds while they are occasionally found in milk, cheese, cottonseed, nuts, almonds, figs, spices, and a variety of other foods and feeds. Milk, eggs, and meat products are sometimes contaminated because of the animal consumption of aflatoxin-contaminated feed
There are 4 main types of aflatoxins that are important as contaminants of food and feed: B1, B2, G1 and G2; and those that are metabolic products: M1 and M2
Aflatoxin B1 and B2 are so named because they exhibit blue fluorescence under UV light; G1 and G2 exhibit yellow-green fluorescence under the same conditions. M1 and M2 were first isolated from lactating cows fed aflatoxin feed, according to Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Aflatoxins have been associated with various diseases, such as aflatoxicosis, in livestock, domestic animals and humans.
It is critical to note that aflatoxin contamination starts at the farm, and that measures to control the menace should start when the produce from planting, harvesting, post-harvest handling, storage and distribution. While on the farm contamination is the least appreciated by many, further contamination can occur during drying, especially on the soil, and at storage or transport.
On the farm, aflatoxins contaminate the crop if harvesting is delayed and if the moisture content of the crop exceeds the required for crops stored at the farm after harvest. Bird and rodent attack of the crop at the farm is a great contributor to aflatoxin contamination.
Certain environmental factors influence the occurring of aflatoxin. The extent of contamination will vary with geographic location, agricultural and agronomic practices, and the susceptibility of commodities to fungal invasion during pre-harvest, storage, and/or processing periods
The fact that the toxin is invisible to the naked eye creates a problem for farmers (and traders and processors) who work on the principle of ‘seeing is believing’, according to Mr Muchiri of EAFF. There is also the common wisdom that visibly damaged and rotten grains find easy use in feeding of livestock at the farm, which transfers the problem to the animals
Mr Muchiri contends that predisposing factors, including high temperature related stresses and droughts, wet harvest, insect damage and high moisture post-harvest conditions, are common in most African farms, thereby making the aflatoxin problem have a huge burden on the continent.
Aflatoxins affect the population
The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN approximates that 25% of the world’s crop is affected by mycotoxins, the majority of which is aflatoxins, or about 4.5 billion of the current 7 billion population of the world. In sub-Saharan African alone, an estimated 26,000 people die annually of liver cancer associated with aflatoxin exposure, according to IFPRI
Aflatoxins and other mycotoxins affect trade, consumer safety and the economic health of the population and countries. Aflatoxins exhibit potent carcinogenic effect in susceptible laboratory animals and have acute toxicological effects in humans.
Kenya has faced some well-known challenges with aflatoxin, with the 2004 case of aflatoxicosis that led to the death of 125 in its Eastern Province, being the most publicized. According to the International Food Policy Research Institute, (IFPRI), Washington USA, investigations by the US Centres for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) after the 2004 case showed that aflatoxicosis was the cause of these deaths.
The effect on trade is also enormous. Dr Ayalew of PACA confirms that it is estimated that Africa loses US$ 450 million a year from lost export trade due to aflatoxins.
With the CDC recently showing through a study that over 60% of the Kenyan population is chronically exposed to aflatoxin, Charity Mutegi, PhD., a researcher at the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI) and who is Kenya Country Coordinator for the Aflatoxin Biocontrol Project at International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), is concerned about the adverse effect of aflatoxin on the economy and health.
The award winning Dr Mutegi, was the 2013 recipient of the Norman Borlaug award for Field Research and Application for her work on aflatoxins.
Dr Mutegi, who spearheaded efforts to identify the cause of, and solution to, a deadly outbreak of aflatoxicosis in Kenya in 2004-05, says that aflatoxin leads to loss of livelihoods caused by poisoning; economic burden of treating aflatoxin related illnesses; loss of trade when food is condemned in markets with stringent regulatory and testing mechanisms; and nutritional effects that cause stunting in children and immune suppression that affect the lives of the children throughout their lifetime
“The devastating effects of maize grain contaminated with aflatoxins on many Kenyan households cannot be understated. Several lives have been lost, tons of staple food destroyed, millions of shillings worth from the livestock sector have been lost; and by extension, several livelihoods have been destroyed through death and/or economic disempowerment,” Dr Mutegi says
Research has shown that aflatoxins cause liver damage, decreased milk and egg production in birds and animals, recurrent infection as a result of immunity suppression, in addition to embryo toxicity in animals consuming low dietary concentrations.
Young children and the young of animals are most susceptible, although all ages are affected but in different degrees for different species. Aflatoxin causes stunting in children which results to delayed development
Clinical signs of aflatoxicosis in animals include gastrointestinal dysfunction, reduced reproductivity, reduced feed utilization and efficiency, anaemia, and jaundice. Nursing animals may be affected as a result of the conversion of aflatoxin B1 to the metabolite aflatoxin M1 excreted in milk of dairy cattle,
Aflatoxins are also known to cause cancer in animals, with aflatoxin B1, M1 and G1 having been shown to cause various types of cancer in different animal species. However, only aflatoxin B1 is considered by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)as having produced sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals to be identified as a carcinogen.
Recent research that aflatoxin may hasten the spread of infectious diseases by suppressing the immune system.Pauline Jolly, PhD professor in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of Alabama, US, has produced work that suggests aflatoxin exposure is having particularly detrimental effects in areas with high HIV rates, according to theinformationdaily.com
In the study, 314 HIV-positive Ghanaians, who had not yet started taking antiretroviral medication, were tested both for their exposure to aflatoxin and their HIV ‘viral load’, which translates to likelihood of transmission from person to person. It was found that those with the highest exposure to aflatoxin were also 2.6 times more likely to have a higher than average viral load.
Control measures exist
The control of management of aflatoxins is a complex problem and requires an integrated approach, according to Dr Ayalew of PACA. A combination of technology solutions, effective regulations and standards, and enabling environment could bring about mitigation and control of aflatoxin on the continent, he adds
“It is important for producers to realize that good agricultural practices (GAP) represent the primary line of defense against contamination of cereals with mycotoxins, followed by the implementation of good manufacturing practices (GMP) during the handling, storage, processing, and distribution of cereals for human food and animal feed”. This statement, from the Codex Alimentarius, is perhaps the most critical in the possibility of the African continent on reducing the impact of aflatoxin in its food systems
Well tried and tested methods exist, including drying grains to the right moisture content (water activity); separation of grain using colour sorters, and fairly traditional ways, including the application of ash or decorticating of the grains, which have been found to be effective ways to reduce aflatoxin.
Bio-control at the farm
It is worth noting that Codex Alimentarius advices that good agricultural practices on the farm are the first line of defense in dealing with aflatoxin.
According to Dr Mutegi, the biocontrol product for aflatoxin management currently under testing in Kenya is Aflasafe KE01. Aflasafe KE01 is a mixture of spores of the bio-control atoxigenic strains (non-toxigenic indigenous Aspergillus flavus fungi) that are coated onto sterile grain (sorghum), which serves as carrier and food for the fungi. The atoxigenic strains grow and multiply on, and disperse from, the carrier to initiate displacement of aflatoxin-producers in the field. The product is applied 2–4 weeks prior to crop flowering.
The product is broadcast onto the crop and soil at an application rate of 10 kg/ha. In Kenya, field testing for an even lower rate of 5kg/ha is underway, translating to a direct cost benefit to the farmer through reduced pricing as a farm input.
Dr Mutegi contends that this method has several advantages including: Modifications to fungal communities caused by application of bio-control strains carry over through the value chain, discouraging contamination in storage and transport, even when conditions are very favorable to fungal growth; Positive influences of atoxigenic strain applications carry over between crops and provide multi-year benefits, with a single application of atoxigenic strains benefiting not only the treated crop but also rotation crops and second season crops that miss a treatment; and that because fungi can spread, as the safety of fungal communities within treated fields improves, so does the safety of fungal communities in areas neighboring treated fields.
The effect of this treatment is therefore carried over year into year and the net effect is that the crop is protected throughout the supply chain. If this can be applied to African farms, and these benefits realised, the effect of aflatoxin in Africa will surely reduce drastically
Manage the whole supply chain
Grain millers and other food handlers and processors are advised to “embrace Total Quality Management systems that ensure the quality and safety of material as well as processes”, advices Mr Mutegi. Through such systems, sources of raw material will be known, production lines will be checked for sources of contamination, storage will be monitored, including packaging and even transportation of finished products. All these steps are possible entry/contamination points for aflatoxin.
African efforts getting organized
For a problem that engulfs the whole continent and which as Dr Ayalew, the program manager of the pan-African Partnership for Aflatoxin Control in Africa (PACA), reckons requires a ‘comprehensive, systematic and multi-sectoral approach’, it is good to note that continent wide and regional approaches are beginning to be formed to combat aflatoxin
This is where the (PACA) comes into the fore. PACA has a vision of an “Africa free from the harmful effects of aflatoxins”.
PACA was formed as a “consortium that aims to coordinate aflatoxin mitigation and management across the most affected sectors of health, trade and agriculture in Africa. As a continental, inter-governmental body, PACA’s role is to provide leadership and coordination for Africa’s aflatoxin control efforts, acting primarily as catalyst, facilitator, partnership and knowledge broker, project developer and information clearing house as well as knowledge management hub related to aflatoxins”.
“PACA also advocates for the establishment of enabling policies and institutions by working with regional economic communities and countries, for increased investment and the mobilization of resources, and acts as a grant maker to support catalytic projects on aflatoxin control priority areas while simultaneously promoting capacity building through the grants”, according to Dr Ayalew, the program manager.
Quite a mouthful mandate, but Dr Ayalew believes that with PACA strategically located within the African Union Commission (AUC), this provides the forum with “the opportunity to utilize the convening power of the AUC and the array of organs, institutions, and mechanisms to facilitate integration, harmonization, and joint action”, and hence should find it easier to deliver on this mandate.
PACA also works with Regional Economic Communities as well as other stakeholders such as technical organization, farmers’ organizations and the private sector. This is where the goals of farmers (as represented by Mr Muchiri’s EAFF, the Governments, researchers, food companies and other stakeholders meet
To add to these efforts, several regional bdies have been formed in the recent years including the Capacity and Action for Aflatoxin Reduction in Eastern Africa (CAAREA), which aims to reduce aflatoxin in Kenyan and Tanzanian maize.
The CAAREA project “will contribute to aspects of the PACA overall aims for Africa, bringing together a multi-disciplinary, multi-national team of scientists to help address the spectre of aflatoxins in eastern Africa” according to its website.
The project includes several partners including KARI, BecA-ILRI Hub, Tanzanian Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) of Australia, the Tanzania Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Cornell University, among others
The project team is working to establish a regional mycotoxin analytical shared platform at the Biosciences eastern and central Africa - International Livestock Research Institute Hub (BecA-ILRI Hub). The platform will include a range of technologies including novel diagnostics well suited to the African context.
These include state-of-the-art, commonly accepted aflatoxin diagnostics and sample preparation and diagnostics technologies (Romer Mills, ultra high performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UHPLC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunocapture-fluorometry); as well as new technologies suited to the African research and crop improvement context (near infrared spectroscopy (NIR)), it adds
Other efforts include the Aflatoxin Policy and Program for the East Africa Region (APPEAR) which aims to ‘provide a comprehensive package of training, technical assistance and pilot operational research activities relevant’ to aflatoxin.
To add to these efforts, the East African Community (EAC) recently formulated the Regional Working Experts Group on Aflatoxins (REWGA) in March 2014 in Burundi. REWGA’s mandate is to provide technical and advisory guidance to EAC Sectoral Council on Agriculture and Food Security and key stakeholders in the region on prevention and control of aflatoxin in the region.
Aflatoxins are not alone
Aflatoxins are not the only mycotoxin groups to worry about, for there are many types of mycotoxins present in our food chain.
Mycotoxins are toxic metabolises produced by fungi, specifically moulds growing on foodstuffs or animal feeds. Mycotoxins, though part of the food chain for centuries, were just discovered in the 1960s and 1970s, with the conclusion that they in fact had been responsible for several cases of animal disease and death. In the decade following 1970 it became clear that mycotoxins have been the cause of human illness and death as well, according to the FAO
It has been established that mycotoxins had been responsible for ergotism, which killed thousands of people in Europe in the last thousand years, alimentary toxic aleukia (ATA) which was responsible for the death of many thousands of people in the USSR in the 1940s; stachybotryotoxicosis, which killed tens of thousands of horses and cattle in the USSR in the 1930s; and aflatoxicosis, which killed 100,000 young turkeys in England in 1960 and has caused death and disease in many other animals, and perhaps man as well, according to Wikipedia
The fact that studies report that 75-100% of the samples contain more than one mycotoxin is an important consideration in the management of mycotoxins.
Multiple occurrences of mycotoxins occur due to the fact that (i) mostfungiare able to simultaneously produce a number ofmycotoxins, (ii) commodities can be contaminated by several fungi, and (iii) completed feed is made from various commodities, according to a paper, Current situation of mycotoxin contamination and co-occurrence in animal feed--focus on Europe by Streit et al.
There are five major groups of mycotoxins that occur in food products: aflatoxins, Zearalenone, ochratoxin, fumonisins, and Deoxynivalenol
Interview with ICRISAT Director General, William D Dar, PhD
AFRICA MUST RISE UP
Dr William Dollente Dar is the Director General of the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). Dr Dar insists that the growth of African agribusiness relies on research on some of the crops that are well adapted to the continent, and that Africa must rise up to the challenge to feed its growing population.
Q: What is the role of ICRISAT on food security?
A: ICRISAT is the global institute dedicated to look at the issues on food security and poverty reduction in the dry lands tropics of the world, with a focus on Asia and Africa. We work on five crops: sorghum, pearl millet, groundnut, chick pea and pigeon pea. These are the nutritious crops for the people in the dry tropics areas of Asia and Africa
We are elevating the game in many respects in terms of these crops being given attention by countries and by Govts.
If you compare today there is a policy distortion in terms of attention given to corn, wheat and rice to the disadvantage of these crops, which are very nutritious and resilient for Asia and Africa.
Our purpose to have the countries in dry land areas become prosperous and see to it that these crops are given the kind of attention they deserve
Q: How is ICRISAT encouraging the planting and consumption of these crops?
A: Let me give you an example. Pigeon pea was not a commercial crop 10 years ago, whether in Asia or Africa. But because of our work and our partnership with some governments, from a negligible hectarage now the crop is grown on 1 million hectares.
It is becoming a cash crop because most of the produce is exported to India – the farmers are therefore more food secure and they also have more money to take care of their daily needs. This is an example with an impact we have done in sub Saharan Africa
The other example is chick pea. Chick pea is as important as pigeon pea. From a negligible hectarage as well, now it is increasing now to almost 1 million hectares in Eastern Africa. It is research for development that we want to do
That was the case 5 years ago, now we are beginning to ask ourselves: how can we add more value to these raw products? We therefore now incubate businesses, together with our partners FARA and UniBRAIN.
In Kenya, we are starting with the sorghum value chain. Same goes for bananas in Uganda and many more crops in other countries
We are pursuing inclusive value chain, and I stress inclusive value chain, so that it is not only big business that gains, but the small holders benefit as well.
Q: Tell us about sorghum
A: Sorghum is regaining attention because of drought. If you compare farmers who plant corn with those who plant sorghum, more often than not their crop fails because of drought. Sorghum is a very hardy crop.
Q: How does ICRISAT connect Africa to India?
We triangulate collaboration between India and Africa. As part of UniBRAIN we are setting up a number of incubation centres in Africa. We are also setting up 5 food testing laboratories. We are investing and technically assisting and implementing these projects. The laboratories will be in Kenya, Uganda and other countries, in partnership of the ministries of industrialisation
What advice can you give Africa, even as it dreams of its Green Revolution?
Africa must take ownership, but you do need partners. You need partners who can help, work with you together. You need partners that have resources and technologies. You should bring in strategic partners. The vision to rise from poverty and hunger has to be there to hav your own Green Revolution. Africa must rise up.
ICRISAT is a non-profit, non-political organization that conducts agricultural research for development in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. ICRISAT is headquartered in Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, with two regional hubs and four country offices in sub-Saharan Africa. It is a member of the CGIAR Consortium. CGIAR is a global agriculture research partnership for a food secure future.
ICRISAT research work is centered on five key crops: sorghum, pearl millet, chick pea, and pea (ground) nuts